Serbia accused of fiddling UN climate change pledge

Contribution to UN pact championed by European Commission represents a 15% rise in CO2 emissions

(Flickr/ Nofrills)

(Flickr/ Nofrills)

By Alex Pashley

Serbia’s carbon-cutting pledge has been welcomed by the European Commission as an “exemplary” step to joining the EU, despite official data revealing it to mean a 15% hike in emissions by 2030.

The plans to cut emissions by 9.8% by 2030 on 1990 levels was announced on Thursday at a press conference in Belgrade, with the commission’s vice-president for energy union, Maros Sefcovic, the Guardian reported.

Though the country’s emissions are already a quarter lower since 1990, after the collapse of heavy industry with the fall of communism, according to a government report sent to the UN’s climate change body in April.

“Emissions of greenhouse gases in 2013 decreased by 3.5% compared to 2010, and 25.1% in relation to 1990,” the paper says. A 9.8% cut in emissions would thus allow a 15.3% rise.

Sefcovic praised Serbia’s offer nonetheless, saying: “Your success today in adopting Serbia’s INDC is an exemplary step on this path [to EU accession].”

But others ridiculed the commission for endorsing the flawed climate policy of the candidate country.

“The Serbian offer is a joke, but no one’s laughing now that the commission says it is an exemplary step on the path to EU membership,” said Garret Tankosić-Kelly, the director of SEEChange, a Bosnian thinktank, focused on sustainable development in the Balkans.

A source at the commission told the Guardian: “This is kind of a fiddle,” one said. “It is actually a very poor announcement and by making it, Serbia is free-riding on the back of countries that are prepared to be much more ambitious.”

It adds scrutiny on a UN agreement to have a robust mechanism to review country’s climate policies and ensure they are credible in curbing global warming.

Australia “systematically overstated” its emissions to ease climate targets, energy analysts charged this week.

Read more on: Climate Politics | |